And a little more about Tulsi Gabbard, as mentioned in my previous article, The War for Our Minds, part 10: Fear, but used to talk about something far more important.
I had detailed how her very public move out of the Democrat Party was a very precisely timed decision, maximizing damage right before a very important election.
Now, I have heard and read enough to see how people are very divided about her.
Some people are very vocal in signaling their complete distrust of her. Gabbard indeed has voiced and supported numerous very liberal positions. She is also part of the WEF!
Very illustrious company, there!
Just like ‘our side’ can infiltrate ‘their side’, this can work the other way around. So why ‘trust’ Gabbard?
Still, she HAS renounced the WEF in clear words.
As I wrote in my previous article, Gabbard was a member of the 351st Civil Affairs Command, switching in October 2020 from the Hawaii National Guard to this Army Psy-Ops unit, suggesting she’d be well versed in these kinds of psy-ops and counter-ops. And her actions are very well-timed, and go against the norm of ‘normal’ democrats, in many ways.
For a great post about her army past, see this liberal warning that she is a wolf in sheep’s clothes. Check out this tweet:
Interestingly, among the very few pictures of her that are available of her on the US Army Reserve website, is this one:
With the accompanying text:
”UNALASKA, Alaska - U.S. Army Reserve Maj. Tulsi Gabbard (2nd from left), Lt. Col. Hugh Dougalas (center), and Lt. Col. Eric Christeson (right), Governance team members from the 351st Civil Affairs Command Functional Specialty Team (FxSP) engage with a Qawalangin Tribe (Q-Tribe) Young Leader during the Innovative Readiness Training Civil-Military Partnership Subject Matter Expert Assessment, Aug. 25, 2020”
Another coincidence, of course. As BioClandestine wrote:
”She’s involved in US MIL psyops, she’s helping combat anti-Russian propaganda, and one of the few bringing attention to the fact that the DNC have Biolabs in Ukraine.
Here she is assisting “(Q-Tribe)” as part of the 351st PSYOP Command.
Y’all… wake up.”
I am inclined, personally, to think that this one actually is coincidence. But fact is, there is a lot going on with her, and people are absolutely confused what to make of her. Democrats think she is a traitor, a Russian asset, and many Republicans think she is a black-hat, a democrat operative, steered by the evil cabal of WEF, trying to infiltrate into conservative circles.
Still, remember the biolabs in Ukraine? At a time when it was all about demonizing Russia, and the few courageous people who pointed out the interesting and obviously ‘coincidental’ overlap between the initial Russian strikes and a map with American funded/run biolabs in Ukraine, she dared to bring this up, forcefully.
Just look at the absolutely furious and angry replies she got, calling for her being investigated as a Russian asset, a traitor, who partook in a clear disinformation campaign.
Notice also how many of the reactions deflected, and denounced ‘bioweapons labs’, something Tulsi did NOT say (she spoke about ‘biolabs’). One of the reactions said: “Very large leap from "biological research facilities" to "biological weapons labs." Whatever research is being done should be safeguarded against capture by Russian troops not trained in handling biological materials or accidental release. Russian Asset”.
Mitt Romney got drawn into the fray, and tweeted:
Tulsi did not take that lying down, and fired back:
“Mitt Romney, you have called me a ‘treasonous liar’ for stating the fact that “there are 25+ US-funded biolabs in Ukraine which if breached would release & spread deadly pathogens to US/world” and therefore must be secured in order to prevent new pandemics. Bizarrely, you claim that securing these labs (or even calling for securing these labs) is treasonous and will lead to a loss of life, when the exact opposite is obviously true. The spread of pathogens is what will cause the loss of life, not the prevention of such spread.
Senator Romney, please provide evidence that what I said is untrue and treasonous. If you cannot, you should do the honorable thing: apologize and resign from the Senate.
Evidence of the existence of such biolabs, their vulnerability, and thus the need to take immediate action to secure them is beyond dispute: [she goes on to provide 6 proofs: Victoria Nuland acknowledging them in a Senate testimony on March 22, 2022; Pentagon Fact Sheet from March 11, 2022; CBS Face the Nation report from March 13, 2022, acknowledging the labs; US Embassy in Ukraine acknowledging their existence in April; CNN fact check on March 10, 2022; and a DOD report about how Russia already had illegally taken possession of two Ukrainian laboratories.]
And she concluded: “So, Senator Romney, you have a choice: out of pride, continue to deny the truth or admit you are wrong, apologize, and resign. Aloha. And remember that without the truth, we can be neither safe nor free.”
And of course, this is when you see normal citizens connect the dots, and post in that thread of Tulsi firing back at Romney, among other awesome reactions, the following question:
Tulsi DID push back, and she DID stick her neck out to warn people about a reality in Ukraine. The debate is not between ‘biolabs’ or ‘bioweapons labs’, as that distinction is irrelevant: any ‘peaceful’ lab can be weaponized very quickly. The point is that such biolabs are present in Ukraine, that they are funded and sometimes run by Americans, and that they do dangerous research in pathogens, routes of contamination/transmission, at times very ethnic based.
Then you get very interesting attacks like this one:
When is the last time you have seen the Democrats attack one of their own like this?
When it matters, she stands up for Americans.
I keep reading in comments from conservatives/MAGA patriots that they reject Tulsi ‘because she voted to impeach Trump’.
She was one of a very few Democrats NOT to vote for the first Trump impeachment on December 18, 2019. She voted present, and two other democrats voted against (one of them, the NJ 2nd Congressional district Jeff Van Drew, later switched parties). She was not an elected official for the second impeachment on Jan 13, 2021.
She also is responsible for completely ending the presidential campaign of Kamala Harris. Who can forget that debate performance? As someone put it rather poetically: “Still, she factually kneecapped Kneepads Harris, earning her some brownie points in my book.”
Even her presidential platform stands apart from the rest. Neither fully Democrat, conforming to the more radical wing of the DNC that has steadily grown in influence, nor Republican or conservative, even if individual talking points seemed to court such voters.
A trusted commentator on Telegram I follow, said:
“I don't trust her at all as a conservative. I do like watching her make life difficult for her fellow Democrats. She singlehandedly ended Harris' White House campaign.
She does not look, act or sound at all like a Democrat. She is entirely different. She is good looking. She is not in a rage. She is straightforward and uses real language, and she is not condescending. That makes her a unicorn on the left. She seems like one of us, but she really isn't.”
Many are a lot less gracious and well-spoken in their opinions on Tulsi:
“How do you install a plant? Need to watch her very closely, just as we do with the fake pirate.”
“Nope. She is WEF. She loves to quote genuine Patriots!”
“Nope- she’s not good for either of them. She’s an American sellout. WEF taught.”
“No. She voted for Bernie and has voted socialist values for a long time..”
“Tulsi Gabbard question: Do any of you believe her?
I listened to it multiple times and all I hear is a WEF Globalist trying to say all the "right" things so she can infiltrate the other side now.”
You get the drift…
Others get creative with memes:
We got the message…
ULTRA Pepe Lives Matter, on Telegram, weighed in:
“My take on the Tulsi Gabbard flip:
According to Q, we are watching the systematic destruction of the old guard. So what better way to red pill normies than through someone who is a Dem?
And yes, I understand that she is WEF but trust is overblown in anon circles. If someone speaks a truth, then it's probably worth highlighting. You don't have to trust her or anyone else but God.
But when a normie hears her speak things like: "The Democrat party is an elitist cabal of war mongers" how can I not support that? It doesn't mean I trust her. But sheep will see this and it will possibly fuel aspects of the awakening.
Could she turn on us in the future? Sure.
But right now, she's dropping red pills right at the outset of the most important midterms in our lifetime.
And I can't help but support truth.”
People like Seth Keshel also have a different take.
In his article on Gabbard, he compared her standing within the DNC as that of Lisa Murkowski in the RNC: hated by the rank-and-file. He points out that she generally seems to agree with the Democrat party agenda, but that she really hates the ‘military industrial complex’, something she, as ‘a post 9/11 veteran with service in Iraq or Afghanistan’, is most suited to identify the problems within that system.
Captain K goes on:
“Since Tulsi Gabbard is no longer a Democrat and certainly no “conservative,” what does all this mean? Is she a Republican? Well, she may become one. Look at many elected in the 2010, 2012, 2014, and 2016 Republican rebounds, and you’ll remind yourself of the futility of electing people just because of the “R” following a name.
Is she America First? In some ways, most certainly.”
And he concludes:
“We must welcome open debate nationally if our ideas are to spread. Gabbard’s announcement is much more consequential than many seem to think.”
On Telegram, BioClandestine goes deep into the topic of ‘trust’. A word thrown around very often, lately: ‘I don’t trust her! Not one bit!’
Here is what he has to offer, and it is a very worthwhile exploration:
“Folks, I see so many people in the community use the word "trust".
As in you don't "trust" Elon, or don't "trust" Tulsi, etc.
Who said anything about "trusting" anyone? And what is it you are "trusting" them with, exactly?
I am merely pointing out realities. And the reality is, characters like Elon and Tulsi have been pulverizing our enemies, and appear to be doing so DELIBERATELY.
Tulsi is swinging centrist voters red, and providing headlines and narratives beneficial to us, leading up to the midterms.
She's an ally. That does not mean that I “trust” her, or anyone for that matter.
I’m merely observing who’s actions are benefiting us, and recognizing trends.
And let’s say, theoretically, one was to “trust” Tulsi, or Elon, or Trump, and it turns out they were actually Deep State rat like many of you all claim.
What would you have lost from putting your “trust” in them? What would you have gained? Absolutely nothing either way.
We are all completely powerless bystanders when it comes to the events that are unfolding. NCSWIC is not just a catch phrase, it means NOTHING can stop what is coming, and that includes the high improbability that Tulsi is a Deep State agent looking gain your “trust”.
All we can do is point out what is actually happening, and what is actually happening is Tulsi just dealt a well-timed, calculated blow to the DNC before the midterms, with time for the media cycle to influence centrist voters, and is doing so by rightfully calling the Biden regime a “warmongering cabal” and denouncing pushing us into proxy wars and pushing us into nuclear destruction, etc.
This situation is the same as you being jumped on the streets, and some stranger jumps in and throws a haymaker to one of the guys jumping you.
You don’t know this guy, but he just punched your assailant right in the face. You don’t necessarily “trust” him, but he just showed you he’s on your side by defending you. If he wasn’t on your side, he would have punched you instead. Or left you to get beaten.
If Tulsi wanted to deal damage to Trump/MAGA before the midterms, she would have done so. She also could have just remained silent. But instead, she intentionally inflicted damage to Biden and the Dems. And she’s been doing so rather consistently for years now.
If her dealing massive damage to the Dems before the most important election in history, is just a ruse to trick you into “trusting” her… well I’d say we win that exchange 😂”
“Trust, but verify”, as Reagan famously said during a December 1987 speech. Interestingly, this is a Russian proverb, Доверяй, но проверяй (Doveryai, no proveryai). Reagan learned it on the prompting of his advisor on Russian Affairs, Suzanne Massie, along with other proverbs, to amuse Mikhail Gorbachev during upcoming talks with the Russian leader. He really took a liking to this particular one. (See? Republicans are FUL OF RUSSIAN AGENTS! Using Russian proverbs as code!)
Reagan himself started out as a Democrat. As did Trump.
People can change, and learn, and grow. Often slowly, not all at once.
Am I saying that I believe Tulsi’s change of heart is sincere? Besides the point, for this article. (To answer it anyway: I actually do believe she is sincere, which doesn’t mean she should be placed on any top ballot for the RNC, without proving herself first.) This is what I wanted to write about, when I started writing this article: We cannot fall into the trap to succumb to a swamp-like tribalism, of ‘us’ versus ‘them’. Where a deep-seated distrust and hatred makes any and all reconciliation impossible.
I am not certain that people in America, and especially those on the conservative/MAGA side of things, understand what it means: a wave is coming. The others have no clue, we talk about it all the time. A tsunami, even! And we gleefully await it.
But have you seen the aftermath of such inundation? Such tidal wave sweeping over a city or village? It is devastating. Those who saw it coming, will have evacuated, but many here in the US have no real idea. The DNC will be pulverized. The FBI, CIA and many other important, powerful and formerly trusted agencies and institutions (trusted, at least in general sense, as corner stones of the American Justice system or Military and Intelligence apparatus), will be left decimated, a crumbling pile that betrays nothing of their former glory and power and influence. Our election system up until now will be largely put into question, based on ever increasing and stunning revelations. What can we trust? Can we even accept any of the laws or rules made in the last 8, 12, 20 years? God knows how long the election fraud has been going on!
Will we recognize our United States of America after that wave has passed?
Our relations with others? Our view of ourselves, if we are really humble: how could we let this happen? How did we not see it sooner?
WHAT HAPPENS AFTER THE WAVE?
In an early article on my substack, titled ‘Die Schuldfrage: who is to blame for the bioweapon labs?’, I wrote:
“The US will suffer an initial huge blow. The home of the brave, and land of the free, beacon of freedom, police of the world, bringer of freedom at 600 rounds a minute in oppressed countries all over the world, is unmasked as worse than Nazi Germany, developing race/ethnicity based bioweapons, among other cruel bioweapons.”
And think about all the US meddling, lately as seen in Ukraine: WE, AMERICA, orchestrated the color revolution in Kiev, that fateful 2014. Nuland, and McCain were behind it. We have been pushing that country to the brink of war, and into actual war and destruction. How many other countries have been destroyed because of our elites playing ‘chess’ with real lives like that?
Do we realize the fall-out of all the news that will be coming out?
There is a glimmer of hope: Putin has been very consistent in NOT blaming ‘The Americans’, but very specific groups: the Democrats and their allies. He knows, he understands. (He better, the Soviet history he hails from isn’t much better!) And if he can understand this, others will to. And we, Americans, make make that distinction, as well, and finally unschackle ourselves from these elites, and be free again.
We will need to be ready, and make sure that our liberty doesn’t get swept away by this wave, or even undermined, by creating a single party system, where we shame and exclude democrats and liberals. Where we take the comfort of the in-groups we have been forced into by the constant demonizing and attacks, as the standard for how society should look like even without such demonizing and attacks. By demanding retribution to every last person involved, however small their role, and by doing so risking to create a permanent rift.
We will have to rebuild. We will need EVERY American, all hands on deck. Even those of democrats. Or former democrats, I should say, after the DNC utterly explodes under the weight of their crimes and fraud.
Is Tulsi Gabbard a white hat? A military mole in the system, placed there to undermine that party by exposing it? The timing, again, is too impeccable, and this has become a pattern. Yes, she said things that are very socialist, too. She had to gain bona-fides, first, to make her later dropping of truth bombs that much more powerful.
Or perhaps she is an old school democrat, a patriot, but more inclined towards social issues, and disagreeing with the far left push the party has seen? And as such, an ally, with a common interest into restoring this nation? “I did not leave the party, the party left me!” is an oft heard refrain, of disenfranchised democrats.
Think about it, too: a two-party system has its advantages and disadvantages, but any disadvantage you might think about, disappears like snow before the sun when you consider a single-party system… There is no way that humans will be able to resist the urge to abuse such power. ZERO.
We need at least 1 other party, to hold the other(s) in check. We need a restoration not just of the checks and balances within government, to prevent abuse such as the FISA warrants and spying by a party and government agencies against a sitting president, but after the wave has passed, and destroyed the DNC and the swampy part of the RNC, we need a restoration of the checks and balances between parties. Properly, without the swamp that makes one elected official from one party completely interchangeable with one from the other party: both corrupt, and beholden to the same masters.
We need people like Tulsi Gabbard. We need not trust her, nor even like her. But we need her, and people like her, who put America first, and who dare speak truth to power, to the best of their abilities, if we want to build up America again.
We need more than just ‘destroy the DNC’, more than simply ‘drain the swamp’. We need to clean up. And that task belongs to we, the people. To you. To me. To all of us. Catholics, Protestants, Orthodox, atheists, agnostics, Muslims, Jews, name it. Poor, middle class, rich, ultra-rich. Very conservative to very liberal. We need a healthy society, build on mutual respect, and a unified project: the nation we have received from our parents, and that we will have to hand off to our children.
Will it be stronger than how we received it?
That is our task.
All is well.
Excellent points!!! I too don’t see just a two party system any longer. I’ve also tried to envision our world after it is bathed in truth. Are we prepared for what remains?
I also agree with your assessment of Tulsi, it is spot on. She may be just what is needed right here and right now. Anyone who is trusting anyone right now is already in trouble, influenced, programmed. We need to utilize people and their skills right now, red pill away. Thank you, I look forward to your next article.
I really appreciate this thorough look into Tulsi. I will keep an open mind, since you pointed out so many important points. My knee jerk reaction to her all along had been that she is a deceiver. Too many people, of either party, were enamored with her glibness in speaking and her "easiness on the eyes". Exactly what a pretender emphasizes. Now I must consider these other things, including her clear renunciation of the WEF. And if she continues to speak the truth about Ukraine, which is sorely lacking in the media and politicians, who continue to push the deep state globalist propaganda, then I am on board with accepting her "help". I was surprised to hear she will be endorsing Kari Lake. That is another good sign. Thanks for another insightful article.