Interesting bit, i missed the video with the people talking about the water tower.
At first glance, the angles don't work if considering shots from the water tower.
I'll look closer, though, to either confirm or rebutt that claim.
It wouldn't be the first time that people, eyewitnesses, take what they "think" they heard/saw for what "actually" happened.
For now, the observed images, locations and shots match a shooter behind the tree on the glass factory roof. But there is so much we don't know yet, or haven't seen/heard/discovered yet, and I can be wrong.
Great images showing that the shot's trajectory lines up with those wounded! You should also take a look at the angles from the sniper teams. A tree blocked the view of one team, and the other could not see the shooter until he got to the peak of the roof (reverse slope concealed him).
For animation showing that sniper team #1 on Left Red Barn could NOT see the shooter:
see @ 50:56 from Dr. Peter McCullough's тАЬCourageous DiscourseтАЭ Substack whose Google Maps :
Yes, thank you. I saw this too. Love ya Doc, but you missed this one. The water tower was THE perfect sniper spot, had a clear view of the entire area, above the trees. 435 feet from the tower's walkway to Crooks' position. Right into the wind too, so no horizontal defection.
Water tower...
https://x.com/I_Am_JohnCullen
Interesting bit, i missed the video with the people talking about the water tower.
At first glance, the angles don't work if considering shots from the water tower.
I'll look closer, though, to either confirm or rebutt that claim.
It wouldn't be the first time that people, eyewitnesses, take what they "think" they heard/saw for what "actually" happened.
For now, the observed images, locations and shots match a shooter behind the tree on the glass factory roof. But there is so much we don't know yet, or haven't seen/heard/discovered yet, and I can be wrong.
Thank you for pointing this out!
I took a closer look:
https://arngrimr.substack.com/p/trump-shooting-update-no-second-shooter
My initial hunch, based on my understanding of the lay of the land, is confirmed. Take a look, what do yo think?
Great images showing that the shot's trajectory lines up with those wounded! You should also take a look at the angles from the sniper teams. A tree blocked the view of one team, and the other could not see the shooter until he got to the peak of the roof (reverse slope concealed him).
For animation showing that sniper team #1 on Left Red Barn could NOT see the shooter:
see @ 50:56 from Dr. Peter McCullough's тАЬCourageous DiscourseтАЭ Substack whose Google Maps :
https://petermcculloughmd.substack.com/p/detailed-analysis-of-trump-assassination?utm_source=post-email-title&publication_id=1119676&post_id=146673505&utm_campaign=email-post-title&isFreemail=false&r=105v9&triedRedirect=true&utm_medium=email
And, last night, Washington Post published a #D analysis: Obstructed view may have delayed sniper response at trump rally https://www.washingtonpost.com/investigations/interactive/2024/trump-rally-shooting-maps-secret-service-analysis/?itid=hp-top-table-main_p001_f009
I was fist with that ;-)
I've seen those sources, and their thinking is already incorporated here. Thanks for sharing those, though, great confirmation!
Yes, thank you. I saw this too. Love ya Doc, but you missed this one. The water tower was THE perfect sniper spot, had a clear view of the entire area, above the trees. 435 feet from the tower's walkway to Crooks' position. Right into the wind too, so no horizontal defection.
Agreed, it was the perfect spot.
Except, no shots were fired from that outlook., and all known impact points of bullets line up with a shooter at the roof.