Thank you. He put his hand up to the wound and got no blood on his hand? How can that possibly be? This explanation doesn't make sense. Blood doesn't immediately gel in one area, at least not that I've ever seen. It drips.
Did you notice the reaction of the audience behind the stage? Do you find that absurdly curious? The witness: why wasn't he afraid that this guy climbing onto the roof with a rifle, in plain sight, would shoot him? And the biggie: how in the world was this guy able to pull this off without being stopped?
There are ways to simply explain the lack of blood on cuff and shirt, based on a simply look at the images we have available of what happened.
See https://arngrimr.substack.com/p/new-facts-and-old-fakes
Thank you. He put his hand up to the wound and got no blood on his hand? How can that possibly be? This explanation doesn't make sense. Blood doesn't immediately gel in one area, at least not that I've ever seen. It drips.
Did you notice the reaction of the audience behind the stage? Do you find that absurdly curious? The witness: why wasn't he afraid that this guy climbing onto the roof with a rifle, in plain sight, would shoot him? And the biggie: how in the world was this guy able to pull this off without being stopped?