How do you explain the lack of blood on his hand, his sleeve? The video shows him grabbing his bloody ear; blood keeps gushing unless there's some sort of tourniquet applied, and according to the video footage there isn't.
Thanks - if there was very little blood, where did all the blood come from in the photo showing his ear all bloody, and how did that blood not get on his hand and sleeve? I'm still in maybe, maybe not mode, just curious about answers to these questions that have arisen.. As far as having the game won... "it ain't over till it's over". But I do agree with you about distractions.
I'm not sure that I'm qualified to answer that but I'll try.
Have you ever seen a gunshot wound in person?
I have. The blood flows quickly at first,and then it stops. That the way it is with sub-caliber ammo .
Case in point I knew a guy who got shot in the arm with a .32 caliber bullet he bread a lot at first,then the bullet hole got closed with muscle tissue and the blood stopped.
I pur a pressure bandage on his arm,and called the authorities and that was
All I could do.
So a lot of blood,then little or none.
None of us will know from sure.
But we should let it go.
The chances that we go to war with Iran are very high right now.
And so are the chances we'll see even more caohtic events as we go into the election
Thank you. He put his hand up to the wound and got no blood on his hand? How can that possibly be? This explanation doesn't make sense. Blood doesn't immediately gel in one area, at least not that I've ever seen. It drips.
Did you notice the reaction of the audience behind the stage? Do you find that absurdly curious? The witness: why wasn't he afraid that this guy climbing onto the roof with a rifle, in plain sight, would shoot him? And the biggie: how in the world was this guy able to pull this off without being stopped?
I've looked at that.
Stage magic can do lots of remarkable things.
But the sloppy handling of the event from all concerned tells me it was a botched CIA hit.
The shot of what's now called "The
Iwo Jima Photo "
Does tell me the press was in on the game.
Trump got shot,for sure.
The fat SS chick,hiding behind Trump tells it all.
I bet she shit her panties.
How do you explain the lack of blood on his hand, his sleeve? The video shows him grabbing his bloody ear; blood keeps gushing unless there's some sort of tourniquet applied, and according to the video footage there isn't.
The ear is mostly cartilage, very few blood vessels in the skin, none in the cartilage.
The wound was small.
The big question is why?
Trump had the game won.
Thus the attempt was real.
We should is, what is the distracting from ?
Thanks - if there was very little blood, where did all the blood come from in the photo showing his ear all bloody, and how did that blood not get on his hand and sleeve? I'm still in maybe, maybe not mode, just curious about answers to these questions that have arisen.. As far as having the game won... "it ain't over till it's over". But I do agree with you about distractions.
I'm not sure that I'm qualified to answer that but I'll try.
Have you ever seen a gunshot wound in person?
I have. The blood flows quickly at first,and then it stops. That the way it is with sub-caliber ammo .
Case in point I knew a guy who got shot in the arm with a .32 caliber bullet he bread a lot at first,then the bullet hole got closed with muscle tissue and the blood stopped.
I pur a pressure bandage on his arm,and called the authorities and that was
All I could do.
So a lot of blood,then little or none.
None of us will know from sure.
But we should let it go.
The chances that we go to war with Iran are very high right now.
And so are the chances we'll see even more caohtic events as we go into the election
Be Safe.
There are ways to simply explain the lack of blood on cuff and shirt, based on a simply look at the images we have available of what happened.
See https://arngrimr.substack.com/p/new-facts-and-old-fakes
Thank you. He put his hand up to the wound and got no blood on his hand? How can that possibly be? This explanation doesn't make sense. Blood doesn't immediately gel in one area, at least not that I've ever seen. It drips.
Did you notice the reaction of the audience behind the stage? Do you find that absurdly curious? The witness: why wasn't he afraid that this guy climbing onto the roof with a rifle, in plain sight, would shoot him? And the biggie: how in the world was this guy able to pull this off without being stopped?